The Final Project Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

The Final Project - Essay ExampleThe occupation of the author evolves in the following manner. In Chapter 1, Zakaria designates a main thesis of the book, according to which we will attestant the emergence of a post-American global order, within the framework of which the USA will retain its predominance simply lose an ability to determine the attributes of international scheme unilaterally (Zakaria, 2008, pp. 1-5). He compares the change in strength dynamics that is taking place currently to the shift in predominance from the Oriental empires to the proto-capitalist West in the 15th to 16th snow, arguing that a similar process can be identified now with regard to the rise of Asian nations (Zakaria, 2008, p. 2). Somewhat counterintuitively, Zakaria claims that globalization which led to the dissemination of Western models of capitalist system and mass consumption culture allowed the potential contenders of the U.S., such as China and India, to increase their competitiveness an d present an stinting challenge to the American role in the world (Zakaria, 2008, pp. 20-21). Nevertheless, according to Zakaria, the political limitations will non allow either India or China to become real rivals to the U.S. in the short-term future, as the spotty economic development and internal affectionate tensions undermine their potential (Zakaria, 2008, p. 97 p. 132). ... Zakaria ends the book with guidelines for the future U.S. distant policy that may be summarized as commitment to multilateral policies, creation of broad alliances with the other massive powers, and an emphasis on legitimacy as a soft power of the USA (Zakaria, 2008, pp. 235-250). For all the arguments presented by Zakaria in his book, the over-optimistic assumptions about the continuing political predominance of the United States in the new globalized world seems the weakest. Zakaria seems to ignore the fact that the loss of economic hegemony was invariably followed by the corresponding weakening of the political role of single nation in the world, as the examples of Holland in the 17th century and Great Britain in the 20th century demonstrated. His optimism on the alleged lack of strong competitors to the U.S. dominance seems misplaced as well even if no single state would match the economic and military-political potential of the U.S., the coalition of them certainly might, and the rise of BRICS (Brazil, India, China, Russia, South Africa) nations shows that rough newly industrialized countries, together with the former contender to the U.S. might, may be not too untold content with the global order determined by the Western geo-economic and geopolitical interests. In addition, Zakarias green enthusiasm about the financial globalization as the driving force of supposedly even economic development may be seen as the greatest problem of the book, as his praises for neoliberal restructuring, especially in India, were contradicted both by the events of the Lehman Brothers cr isis of September 2008 and the overheating processes in the economies of India and China that led to inflationary pressures and rising social